Millard Zimet updated his complaint on the alleged unconstitutional nature of the May election, because of the lack of voter anonymity.
The complaint will be heard by the Election Commission on May 5 at 3:30 p.m. in a City meeting room.
The complaint update details how he determined Mayor Mick Ireland’s likely voting data from cast vote records improperly collected in order of poll book entries, and then publicly released by the city. (the ballots were not shuffled, nor were the ballot image files, before being scanned or released.)
Mayor Ireland declared Zimet’s complaint to be of “no substance,” and that the Commission has “nothing to act on.”
The meeting will surely be interesting. The legal advice will apparently be offered by the City Attorneys who helped design this system and did not require the randomizing of ballot records. Additionally they represent the elected officials.
His complaint update as of 4.29.10 is posted at:
http://www.glassballotbox.org/storage/Zimet4.29Complaint.pdf
The original and 1st update of the complaint are
posted in the links below
along with supporting documents:http://aspenelectionreview.blogspot.com/2010/04/letter-by-millard-zimet-to-aspen.html
Complaint :
http://theredant.squarespace.com/storage/ZimetComplaintToElecComm.pdf
Attachments:
http://theredant.squarespace.com/storage/BallotLogZimet.pdf
http://theredant.squarespace.com/storage/walkInMailInLog.xls
http://theredant.squarespace.com/storage/Aspen_IRV_StringsReadOnly.xls
Relevant CO Supreme Court Case:
http://theredant.squarespace.com/storage/TAYLOR%20v%20PILE%20154%20Colo%20516%201964.pdf
=============================================
Addendum and update to Non-Secret Ballot Complaint:
http://theredant.squarespace.com/storage/MillardZ2.0.pdf
http://theredant.squarespace.com/storage/Poll%20Book%20PageZimet2.0.pdf
http://theredant.squarespace.com/storage/TrueBallotScannerBatches.pdf
http://theredant.squarespace.com/storage/Aspen_IRV_StringsReadOnly.xls
-Aspen's historic May 5, 2009 IRV election audited as single ballots- 5/5/09 Aspen CO held an instant runoff election (IRV) for mayor and 2 council members. Interpreted contents of each ballot, scanned by True Ballot, were publicly released. Open records requests for a CD of image scans were denied. Aspen has been sued to protect records from destruction and to allow inspection of the scanned ballot files. A Court of Appeals ruling holds that unidentifiable ballots are public records.
Search this and related blogs
Thursday, April 29, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
10
(66)
-
▼
Apr
(19)
- Election Commission to Hear Zimet Complaint Allegi...
- City View of Aspen Election Commission Role and Re...
- Harvie Branscomb comments on news about Aspen Elec...
- Provocative bill to take Colorado to a universal m...
- Email by Marilyn Marks to Election Commissioners c...
- Criticism of Caleb Kleppner Guest Editorial in Asp...
- Discussion of ballot text for possible future Aspe...
- Aspen response to Marks' response to Aspen's motio...
- TrueBallot certifies Aspen May 5, 2009 election "f...
- City of Aspen &TrueBallot Inc. Misrepresentations ...
- Marks' reply to Aspen regarding motion to reconsid...
- Second Meeting of Aspen 2010 Election Commission- ...
- UNDERSTANDING WHAT “SECRET BALLOT” MEANS IN COLORA...
- Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Amend Judgme...
- What’s being hidden, and why? (Letter to Editor by...
- conversations with the new Election Commissioners-...
- Aspen Daily News and Aspen Times polls regarding ...
- Site Navigation by Timeline - Use this article to ...
- Letter by Millard Zimet to Aspen Election Commissi...
-
▼
Apr
(19)
Election Blog List
-
-
The Voting News has moved!13 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment